I called myself Miss Amy for a while. Not to be formal and all… It’s become sort of a term of endearment.
I was frustrated – I didn’t understand why so many of my community seemed to be homophobic. Giving myself this name was “copping an attitude”. I wrote this short essay which got printed in the Emerald City Social Club’s newsletter in 2004. The Emerald City Social Club is a vital and ongoing part of Seattle’s trans community. I got a lot of positive comments; someone wanted me to do an “Ask Miss Amy” column.
Well, okay – please remember that this is my opinions and perceptions – I don’t claim to speak for anyone else. From my point of view, things have changed a lot in 6 years. Please forgive my clumsy attempt at feminism…
********************************************************
I’ve been calling myself Miss Amy. Maybe I’ll just start calling myself Miss.
I started calling myself Miss Amy sometimes because it is: 1. An acknowledgement of what I feel is my debt to gay culture as a transgender person. 2. More fun than plain old Amy. It’s camp. 3. An affirmation about gay sexuality; about effeminacy; and femininity, in general. 4. I associate it with feminism. And:
5. An idea that came to me from reading the book “Honey, Honey, Miss Thang: Being Black, Gay, and on the Streets” by Leon Pettiway. I was inspired by its depiction of an unapologetic, proud identification with femme sexuality within the trans community by people of color. They were sad stories. I found it harrowing but identified with the protagonists.
[It seems to me that there is a whole segment of the trans community that is too often invisible – the transwomen of color. And as in everything else about American culture, they have contributed so much. I have an impression of black transwomen being germane to the present day trans self-image; a very empowered persona that goes back many decades ; maybe, all the way back to Africa. Link: ‘5 Black Trans Women Who Paved The Way’]
According to my dictionary, Mr., Miss, Mrs. and Ms. are all words added before a name as a “title of courtesy”.
There is no information given in the title Mr. that tells us whether the man is married or not. One would think that it isn’t important; that it isn’t any of our business.
The title “Miss” is the closest real challenge to male prerogative. It is derived from Mistress, which is sometimes used to denote a woman in a position of authority. Look it up. (Actually, Mrs. and Ms. are also derived from mistress.)
Do I want to challenge the idea of male prerogative? Or should I simply seek to exist completely independent of it? There is something about femininity that seems to transcend this whole question. I love this about femininity. It is so not male. It is something else, altogether. It is powerful.
Ms. to me will always be a word that exists in relation to the word Mr. It’s a made-up word; it was made-up to be the equivalent of the title “Mr.” As such, it has no real identity or personality of it’s own; other than as a gender indicator that is not marriage-specific. It exists as a response to the male title, Mr.
As a gender indicator, I think it should carry a more independent meaning than that which is in relation to ; it should have more gravity. Why not an affirmation of something that is powerful about women? Ms. always seemed to me kind of frumpy and self-consciously PC.
Miss seems more empowered than Mrs., to me. You are still a commodity as a Miss; therefore, desirable. It is socially acceptable to pursue someone who is a Miss. It is much less socially acceptable to pursue a Mrs.; if acceptable at all. Certainly not so in ‘mainstream’ American culture; or in Muslim culture, for example.
And okay, let’s not commodify ourselves. I know that. It’s a whole different topic; maybe two or three.
How do culture and language objectify women?
Why can’t Miss mean the same thing as Mister? Why can’t a woman always be a Miss; which is what she starts out as, anyway? Why not; even if she is married? Whose business is it, anyway? It is apparently not considered “courteous” to give that information out about men on a casual basis. So what’s the problem?
More and more women are keeping their maiden names. Why not keep the same “title of courtesy?” Why wouldn’t a woman want to be called Miss?
The truth? They do. Just think about it. Wouldn’t you like it if someone called you Miss?
//
September 7, 2010
A Title Of Courtesy
Posted by Amy Eighttrack under attitude, Books, commentary, feminism, femme, gender identity dysphoria, LGBT, people of color, sexuality, social commentary, transgender | Tags: attitude, Books, commentary, feminism, femme identity, gender identity dysphoria, people of color, sexuality, social commentary, transgender |Leave a Comment
I called myself Miss Amy for a while. Not to be formal and all… It’s become sort of a term of endearment.
I was frustrated – I didn’t understand why so many of my community seemed to be homophobic. Giving myself this name was “copping an attitude”. I wrote this short essay which got printed in the Emerald City Social Club’s newsletter in 2004. The Emerald City Social Club is a vital and ongoing part of Seattle’s trans community. I got a lot of positive comments; someone wanted me to do an “Ask Miss Amy” column.
Well, okay – please remember that this is my opinions and perceptions – I don’t claim to speak for anyone else. From my point of view, things have changed a lot in 6 years. Please forgive my clumsy attempt at feminism…
********************************************************
I’ve been calling myself Miss Amy. Maybe I’ll just start calling myself Miss.
I started calling myself Miss Amy sometimes because it is: 1. An acknowledgement of what I feel is my debt to gay culture as a transgender person. 2. More fun than plain old Amy. It’s camp. 3. An affirmation about gay sexuality; about effeminacy; and femininity, in general. 4. I associate it with feminism. And:
5. An idea that came to me from reading the book “Honey, Honey, Miss Thang: Being Black, Gay, and on the Streets” by Leon Pettiway. I was inspired by its depiction of an unapologetic, proud identification with femme sexuality within the trans community by people of color. They were sad stories. I found it harrowing but identified with the protagonists.
[It seems to me that there is a whole segment of the trans community that is too often invisible – the transwomen of color. And as in everything else about American culture, they have contributed so much. I have an impression of black transwomen being germane to the present day trans self-image; a very empowered persona that goes back many decades ; maybe, all the way back to Africa. Link: ‘5 Black Trans Women Who Paved The Way’]
According to my dictionary, Mr., Miss, Mrs. and Ms. are all words added before a name as a “title of courtesy”.
There is no information given in the title Mr. that tells us whether the man is married or not. One would think that it isn’t important; that it isn’t any of our business.
The title “Miss” is the closest real challenge to male prerogative. It is derived from Mistress, which is sometimes used to denote a woman in a position of authority. Look it up. (Actually, Mrs. and Ms. are also derived from mistress.)
Do I want to challenge the idea of male prerogative? Or should I simply seek to exist completely independent of it? There is something about femininity that seems to transcend this whole question. I love this about femininity. It is so not male. It is something else, altogether. It is powerful.
Ms. to me will always be a word that exists in relation to the word Mr. It’s a made-up word; it was made-up to be the equivalent of the title “Mr.” As such, it has no real identity or personality of it’s own; other than as a gender indicator that is not marriage-specific. It exists as a response to the male title, Mr.
As a gender indicator, I think it should carry a more independent meaning than that which is in relation to ; it should have more gravity. Why not an affirmation of something that is powerful about women? Ms. always seemed to me kind of frumpy and self-consciously PC.
Miss seems more empowered than Mrs., to me. You are still a commodity as a Miss; therefore, desirable. It is socially acceptable to pursue someone who is a Miss. It is much less socially acceptable to pursue a Mrs.; if acceptable at all. Certainly not so in ‘mainstream’ American culture; or in Muslim culture, for example.
And okay, let’s not commodify ourselves. I know that. It’s a whole different topic; maybe two or three.
How do culture and language objectify women?
Why can’t Miss mean the same thing as Mister? Why can’t a woman always be a Miss; which is what she starts out as, anyway? Why not; even if she is married? Whose business is it, anyway? It is apparently not considered “courteous” to give that information out about men on a casual basis. So what’s the problem?
More and more women are keeping their maiden names. Why not keep the same “title of courtesy?” Why wouldn’t a woman want to be called Miss?
The truth? They do. Just think about it. Wouldn’t you like it if someone called you Miss?
//